In the early fourteenth century, the Golden Horde was at the peak of its power. It ruled over a vast territory stretching from the Irtysh River to Eastern Europe, and its cities were bustling hubs of trade. Yet within a few decades, this formidable empire was tearing itself apart, plunged into the chaos of internal and external conflicts. What devastated the once-unshakeable state? One long-overlooked answer is the Black Death. The plague that swept across Eurasia in the 1340s did not spare the Golden Horde: it killed millions, disrupted trade, and shattered the foundations on which the empire rested. Qalam spoke with Uli Schamiloglu, professor at Nazarbayev University, about this crisis, the origins of the plague, and the role of the Turkic peoples in the history of the empire.
At what point did the Ulus of Jochi, the Mongol realm later known as the Golden Horde, stop being simply a part of the Mongol Empire and become an independent Turko-Mongol empire?
First, thank you very much for inviting me to your program, and thank you for the question. This is an interesting question, because many people think that the Ulus of Jochi, also known as the Golden Horde, became independent in 1269, when they held the Talas Kurultaii
I don’t have a problem with trying to be legalistic about it. I would just say that I don’t really see what changed. And I would also ask: what was the Ulus of Jochi, or the Golden Horde, before that?
Very early on, Chinggis Khan granted Jochii
Batu Khan on the throne. Miniature from Rashid al-Din’s Jami' al-Tawarikh (Compendium of Chronicles). Early 14th century / Wikimedia Commons
So I don’t really see what the fundamental transformation was. I may be wrong, but I just don’t see how it was a fundamental transformation. It’s more of a legalistic argument.
The Mongols who conquered the western steppe were vastly outnumbered by the Turkic peoples they ruled. How exactly did the Turkicization of the Mongol elite happen?
I believe that the Chinggisid elite—we’re talking about Batu Khan, Berke Khani
On the other hand, what if the Mongolian armies were not bringing their wives and families with them? I’ve looked a little, and I haven’t found any information about this.
So here is what I’m thinking, if we leave the elite aside. It’s really interesting: if we consider that the Mongolian troops might not have had their wives with them, whom were they marrying, if they were starting families and having children?
If you think about it, the majority of the population in western Eurasia, along the Volga River, in the North Caucasus, and in some of these other places, would have been Turkic-speaking Kipchaks, or Cumansi
Some of them would have been Iranian-speaking Alansi
And in the north, in the Volga region, you would have had speakers of perhaps Volga Bulgariani
So I think one way to look at it is that probably the Mongolian men were having children with non-Mongolian women, and that this might have led, partially, to the ethnic and therefore the linguistic transformation. This seems especially plausible if we consider the account of William of Rubrucki
William of Rubruck before a Mongol ruler. Miniature from a medieval manuscript. 14th century / Parker Library, Corpus Christi College, Cambridge / Wikimedia Commons
And so Batu Khan didn’t have his own tent or house, but he had … I’m making it up, forty … Or each wife had forty carts drawn by oxen with houses on them, each one pulled by, like, twelve oxen. Even if each of his wives was a Mongolian speaker, probably her servants were not Mongolian, and probably the women who took care of the children were not Mongolian.
The wet nurses—or, as in older Kazakh custom, the women who sang songs and lullabies to the children—were probably not Mongolian speakers either. So I really think that within one or two generations, the children, even children of the elite born and raised within their camps, were probably not being raised in Mongolian. Or if they were bilingual, maybe they stopped being bilingual and became monolingual within a generation after 1253. Are we talking about the 1270s, perhaps?
Somewhere I read about coins being struck in Turkic in that period, around the 1270s. By the time we get to the first half of the fourteenth century, we begin to see the rise of a tradition of Muslim Turkic literature.
Nicholas Poppei
The Sack of Suzdal by Batu Khan’s army in 1238. Miniature from the Illustrated Chronicle of Ivan the Terrible. 16th century / National Library of Russia / Wikimedia Commons
I’ve seen them at the museum, and those are really the only examples, unless you count these paizasi
You have written extensively about plague and crises in the Golden Horde. How was the Golden Horde connected to the spread of the Black Death, the great plague pandemic of the mid-fourteenth century, across Eurasia?
The first thing is that today, based upon modern genetic analysis of antibodies against the strains of the plague, a group of Chinese scholars a little over ten years ago reconstructed the genetic history of the different strains of the bacterium Yersinia pestis, which is responsible for the disease called bubonic plague—in Russian, bubonnaya chuma, in Kazakh, oba. This is spread by rodents. One can talk a lot about that too, but I won’t.
So it’s clear that for them, the point of origin can be localized to the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. That’s where you have major trade routes crossing, and they linked that region to the moments when there were mutations in the bacterium that made it more deadly. This happened around or before 540, at the time of the first pandemic in recorded history, during the reign of the Byzantine Emperor Justinian.
It happened again sometime in maybe the thirteenth century, the 1200s, though they believe more likely around the 1330s, maybe earlier, or the 1340s. An important role is played by the Lake Issyk-Kul region, because it seems there were moments when the plague, or the bacterium, would spread, but it needs to establish itself in what people would call a focus, or locus.
It seems that in the Lake Issyk-Kul region, they found seventeen bodies in Buranai
Yersinia pestis bacteria, the causative agent of plague. Scanning electron microscope image / National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) / Wikimedia Commons
The same bacterium has been found in one specimen in Bolgari
It spread across Central Asia. It came to Khwarazmi
From 1346, it spread via the Black Sea trade to Constantinople, from Constantinople to Alexandria in Egypt and to Sicily, and then on to Europe.
There are other theories, too, that there may also have been a northern route of transmission.
I think what inspired me to study this was one paragraph in a book by the great American historian William McNeilli
Of course, as somebody strongly interested in the Golden Horde, I said, hey, wait a minute, this is very, very interesting. So I started looking around for written sources, and indeed there are a tremendous number of them. There are Arabic sources, references in the Russian chronicles, and other kinds of sources where you can find information about it.
The problem is that people did not look for this kind of information, or they did not contextualize it. For example, the European scholar Ole Jørgen Benedictowi
Pieter Bruegel the Elder. The Triumph of Death. Circa 1562 / Museo del Prado, Madrid / Wikimedia Commons
So I’m thinking: if this same outbreak of plague was first in Turkestan, or first in the territories of the Golden Horde, where you have cities like Sarai and heavily populated areas like Crimea, what if it had the same consequences there?
And I started to find lots of information. The brief summary of my conclusions is, first of all, that from the 1340s or earlier, certainly earlier for Khwarazm, waves of bubonic plague were affecting the territories of the Golden Horde. Where it hit sedentary centers, you may have had a catastrophic decline in population.
In Europe, in some places 10 per cent of the population would die; in the next neighborhood, 90 per cent. So I’m not making any uniform statements, but it really does seem now, the more I think about it, that there was tremendous depopulation in western Eurasia.
Let’s say along the Volga River, maybe along the Ural River, and points to the west. So I think there was tremendous depopulation. The amazing thing about the Golden Horde, or the western part of the Ulus of Jochi, the Aq Ordai
Before that, there were evidently multiple waves of plague in the 1340s, and in the 1350s: 1357, 1358. That is certainly when the Volga Bulgarian inscriptions stop being written. We know from various sources that there were waves of plague in the 1360s, which affected, among others, the author of the Nahj al-Faradis.
So it’s surprising that the Golden Horde didn’t collapse before 1359. When it did collapse, it collapsed very, very hard.
So I think what happened is that the sedentary territories lost population. I think nomads in general are not as easily affected by epidemic disease, so epidemiologically, they were not affected. I think this was also true in the time of the Prophet Muhammad, when the plague of Justinian was still recurring. The Bedouins remained strong, while the sedentary populations disappeared.
In the case of the Golden Horde, I think Sarai, Crimea, and Volga Bulgaria suffered very greatly from population loss. But what we see in this period is that nomadic groups such as the Sicivut, the Qongirat, the Manghit, and the Qiyat remained, as far as we can tell, as forces, while the sedentary political center collapsed.
The other thing I see is that when Tokhtamyshi
So how is it possible that the people who came with Tokhtamysh became the fundamental population? I think if you take into account that there was tremendous depopulation … The Qongirat moved to the territories of Khwarazm, in today’s Uzbekistan; the Manghit were in the steppe; some of the others we don’t know so much about. But I think such a population transformation was a result of the original depopulation after the 1340s, or after 1359.
Battle between Timur and Tokhtamysh Khan. Miniature / Topkapı Palace, Istanbul / Wikimedia Commons
Can we say that it was one of the reasons the Golden Horde weakened?
I think it was one reason for its total collapse. What you have is 1359, and then, later, the establishment of new khanates, like Crimea in the 1440s and the Kazan Khanate in the 1430s. That’s not the same period. That’s a totally different set of circumstances.
The Golden Horde stretched from Lake Zaysan and the Irtysh all the way to Eastern Europe. The Khanate of Kazan covered about 100 kilometers. The Crimean Khanate was centered on Crimea.
Kasimovi
That’s what the Golden Horde did.